Several weeks ago I discovered
Rosedale Diet. The author claims his program will "turn off your hunger switch." Even more importantly (in my opinion) is
claim that
plan will also curb sugar cravings by addressing
modern problem of leptin insensitivity. This is done by increasing Omega 3 fats, and limiting protein and highly refined carbs.Naturally, if I recommend a diet, I have to try it out on myself. It wouldn't be very fair to do otherwise. I bought some fish, nuts and avocados, and kept to
diet for about two weeks. During that time I can honestly say that I had little desire to eat very much. I wasn't sure if this was caused by
leptin balance, or simply because I told myself I wouldn't want to eat. During
beginning phase of a diet, it's always easy to convince myself that it's working.
Then I had company, and I used it as an excuse to head down to
Cuban restaurant I'd been hearing so much about. It was a treat, and I found more excuses for more treats while my company was in town. For a few days,
diet was forgotten. In just that short time, I became aware of a remarkable difference in
way I felt about food.
Almost immediately after going off
Rosedale diet, I felt compelled to eat everything in sight. It took willpower and commitment to not give into this compulsion.
But I was not hungry! I was no more hungry after I went off
diet than I had been while following
program. What seemed to be missing was
"not hungry" signals that tell
brain to quit eating.
"Hungry" is a feeling that middle-class Americans rarely (if ever) experience. Yet we eat, and eat, and eat. We blame it on cravings, emotions, nerves, and habits. But perhaps Dr. Rosedale is right. We may be missing
"not hungry" signals that are needed to turn off our hunt for food.
Another thing I noticed while eating
Rosedale way was that I was actually more interested in food while on
diet than I was during
days when I fell off
program. I mean that I was more interested in
taste of food.