For a while there,
Internet and
World Wide Web showed great promise. They whispered sweet nothings in our ears, promising to be
voice of
marginalized,
new democracy,
great equalizer.
But it wasnt to be, for
Internet has a new master. No, its not Google. No, its not Microsoft. And no, its not even good ole Uncle Sam. Theyre just caretakers. The Internets new master is bigger than theyll ever be, and far, far older.
Meet
master
The Internets new master is
same master who holds
leash of all traditional commercial media.
The Internets new master is money and power. Not
capacity to earn money or
capacity to increase power (although those are certainly nice fringe-benefits). No,
Internets new master is
moneyed, powerful collective. Those who simultaneously mould and reflect mainstream opinion, values, and behavior.
I suppose we should have foreseen it, given
Internets military birthplace. But then, we were young and optimistic, and boy did we want to believe!
A little melodramatic? Perhaps. But fairly accurate nonetheless. Let me explain...
The early promise of equity
The Internet started out as a network of computers set up for military purposes. To cut a long story short,
World Wide Web started out simply because it could;
Internet was there to host it, and
technology was there to deliver it. Both were heralded as
new face of democracy at long last,
voiceless had a voice.
Of course, even in those heady days, we all recognized some fundamental practical and technological limitations which really threw a spanner in
works for
New World Orderless theory. To begin with,
great majority of
worlds population didnt even have access to a computer, much less own one with Internet access. In fact, that was still
case even after
new master took
reins (and probably still is).
But we had faith in
Internets potential. I even wrote a paper in
mid 90s discussing
Internets promise for empowerment, and I quote:
Being such a decentralized, anonymous form of communication,
Internet offers great opportunities to
worlds oppressed improved (anonymous if desired) communications capabilities, and better access to more sources of local and international news, to name just a couple. At
same time,
Internet poses great threats to
worlds existing media and political powers, not only because of
re-distribution of information (and, therefore, power) to
populace, but also because of
apparent impracticality (impossibility?) of regulating
information flowing in and out of any country.
Alas, I did not see
Internets true potential for censorship and control... Content.
He who wields content is king
We often hear that content is king. The logic of
argument is as follows. For some time now,
lions share (some 80%) of Internet traffic to
average website has been coming from
major search engines. Whats more, when people use search engines, they rarely look past
second page of search results. Additionally, research suggests that being number 1 in Google equates to twice as much traffic as being number 2. This means you need to rank in
first two pages of
major search engines ideally at number 1 before your voice begins to be heard. The only way to reach
top of
search engines is to have thousands of links back to your website from other websites. There are two reliable ways of achieving this goal:
- Publish helpful information on your website and constantly update it so that others link to your site because its so great keep eyes on paper. Some popular methods include news sites, BLOGS, folksonomies, journals, e-newsletters, and customizable web portals like Google Personalized, which allows visitors to choose (from a pre-determined selection) what they see, e.g. news, email, weather, stocks, etc.
- Write helpful articles and let publishers of newsletters and ezines use them for free on
proviso that they link back to your site. (These articles are quite often written by SEO copywriters, and they need to be submitted to established article banks, from which they are gathered by online publishers for free.)
In other words, to reach
top of
search engines, you need to publish virtual reams and reams of high quality, informed content (i.e. copy). And you need to keep doing it indefinitely.
On
basis of this evidence,
saying that content is king has become somewhat of a truism. But when we look closely,
saying is inaccurate. Theres nothing wrong with
logic; its
conclusion thats
problem. In reality, content is no more king than was
sword. In reality, he who wields
content is king (and I say he with intent, as
wielder is generally male or some patriarchal organization).
And who wields
content? Only those with
social power to command an education and
money to indulge in
time-consuming task of researching, writing, and publishing said content (or those who have
budget and foresight to engage an SEO copywriter).
Wielding content is getting harder