Venture vs. Vulture Capitalists By William Cate Published July 1999 [http://home.earthlink.net/~beowulfinvestments/] [http://home.earthlink.net/~beowulfinvestments/globalvillageinvestmentclubwelcome/]In last issue of EFS (V3#10), my Venture Capital article reflected current experiences of three small Silicon Valley companies. My article generated comments from four Venture Capitalists. In essence, there are Venture Capitalists and there are Vulture Capitalists.
Venture Capitalists fund one company in every 2,500 companies that query them. Their preferred exit strategy is private sale of company. They are willing to hold their equity in an investment for years. They believe that they bring management and financial skills to company that will enhance company's probability of success. If two-of-seven investments (29%) succeed, they make money.
Vulture Capitalists fund one company in every 100 companies that query them. Their preferred exit strategy is to take company public. They intend to recover their risk capital quickly. They bring sales skills to company. Their goal is to make money on every investment.
I've come across Vulture Capitalists offering toxic convertibles. They act as Merchant Bankers offering bridge financing. They offer secondary Private Placement financing to high flying, usually Hi-Tech public companies.
The Merchant Banking loans require repayment of loan and interest from underwriting. The Merchant Banker demands a large bloc of free stock for making loan. The Merchant Banker dumps stock quickly into Market. About two years ago, SEC moved to stop this practice. Any outside party considering doing Bridge Loan financing for a bloc of stock is asking for trouble from SEC. Without stock incentive, bridge loan is too risky. After all, only half IPO's are underwritten. Unless you are underwriter, you can't be certain that underwriting will happen.